- Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:45 pm
#7762
The Dodgers are stirring the pot with their closer situation for the 2025 season, and it’s raising some intriguing questions. Dave Roberts has declined to officially name Tanner Scott as the designated closer, despite earlier indications that he would take on that role. Instead, it seems the Dodgers are leaning towards a matchup-based strategy for their bullpen, which could lead to a more dynamic and unpredictable late-game scenario.
This brings us to a few points worth discussing. First, how do you feel about the Dodgers' approach to closing games? Is it wise to avoid naming a definitive closer, or does it create unnecessary uncertainty?
Tanner Scott himself has expressed a desire to contribute to the team’s success, regardless of the title. This raises another question: how important is the label of closer to a player’s performance? Can a player thrive without the pressure of a defined role, or does that title carry weight that impacts their mindset?
Moreover, with the Dodgers' star-studded bullpen, how do you think they should best utilize their pitchers in high-pressure situations? Should they stick with a traditional closer, or embrace a more fluid strategy that allows for flexibility based on matchups?
Lastly, let’s make some bold predictions. If Tanner Scott doesn’t end up as the primary closer, who do you think will step up in that role? Will it be a surprise candidate, or do you think the Dodgers will stick with their current roster?
Join the conversation and share your thoughts! What’s your take on the Dodgers’ bullpen strategy, and how do you see it playing out this season?
This brings us to a few points worth discussing. First, how do you feel about the Dodgers' approach to closing games? Is it wise to avoid naming a definitive closer, or does it create unnecessary uncertainty?
Tanner Scott himself has expressed a desire to contribute to the team’s success, regardless of the title. This raises another question: how important is the label of closer to a player’s performance? Can a player thrive without the pressure of a defined role, or does that title carry weight that impacts their mindset?
Moreover, with the Dodgers' star-studded bullpen, how do you think they should best utilize their pitchers in high-pressure situations? Should they stick with a traditional closer, or embrace a more fluid strategy that allows for flexibility based on matchups?
Lastly, let’s make some bold predictions. If Tanner Scott doesn’t end up as the primary closer, who do you think will step up in that role? Will it be a surprise candidate, or do you think the Dodgers will stick with their current roster?
Join the conversation and share your thoughts! What’s your take on the Dodgers’ bullpen strategy, and how do you see it playing out this season?
- By Anonymous