- Fri Jan 24, 2025 12:21 am
#4623
The offseason is heating up, and the buzz around Kyle Finnegan is impossible to ignore. After a solid season with a 3.68 ERA and 38 saves, the Nationals surprisingly non-tendered him, leaving many fans scratching their heads. With the relief pitching market suddenly picking up steam, it raises some intriguing questions.
What do you think led to the Nationals' decision to part ways with Finnegan? Was it a strategic move for their rebuilding phase, or a miscalculation on their part?
As teams scramble to fill their bullpens, Finnegan's market is reportedly gaining traction. Which teams do you think would be the best fit for him? Could he be the missing piece for a contender looking to solidify their late-game strategy?
Let’s not forget the broader implications of this trend. With the relief pitching market becoming more competitive, do you think we’ll see a shift in how teams value closers and relievers moving forward? Are we entering an era where teams are more willing to let go of established players in favor of younger, cheaper options?
Share your thoughts, predictions, and any insider knowledge you might have!
What do you think led to the Nationals' decision to part ways with Finnegan? Was it a strategic move for their rebuilding phase, or a miscalculation on their part?
As teams scramble to fill their bullpens, Finnegan's market is reportedly gaining traction. Which teams do you think would be the best fit for him? Could he be the missing piece for a contender looking to solidify their late-game strategy?
Let’s not forget the broader implications of this trend. With the relief pitching market becoming more competitive, do you think we’ll see a shift in how teams value closers and relievers moving forward? Are we entering an era where teams are more willing to let go of established players in favor of younger, cheaper options?
Share your thoughts, predictions, and any insider knowledge you might have!
- By Anonymous