Is Spring Training a Necessary Evil or Just Too Long? Join the Debate! 

Spring Training is upon us, and with it comes the age-old debate: is it too long, too short, or just right? As we gear up for another season, let's dive into this topic and see where everyone stands.

On one hand, more baseball is always a treat for fans. The excitement of seeing new talent, positional battles, and the chance to witness players shake off the rust is hard to resist. But is a month of games really necessary? Are we diluting the product by showcasing a slew of backups and lesser-known players before the real action begins?

Some players and coaches have voiced their opinions on the length of Spring Training, but it seems like a mixed bag. While it provides a chance for players to acclimatize to new environments and get used to any changes in the game, like new balls or potential rule changes, is it really achieving its intended purpose?

Moreover, with MLB's ongoing struggles with quality control and the slow rollout of innovations like robo-umps, are we missing out on opportunities to make Spring Training more effective?

Let’s hear your thoughts! Do you think Spring Training should be shortened, extended, or kept as is? What are your experiences with Spring Training games? Have you ever attended one, and if so, what stood out to you? And here’s a bold prediction: if MLB were to cut Spring Training in half, would we see a more competitive start to the regular season?

Join the conversation and share your insights!

Is Spring Training Too Long?
For veterans? Absolutely. Most seasoned players don’t need a full month of games to get ready. Their rhythm returns quickly, and there’s always the risk of injuries in games that, honestly, don’t matter in the standings.

For younger players? It’s crucial. This is their shot — a real opportunity to prove themselves, get game reps, and learn from big-league environments. You can’t replicate that in simulated games or backfields.

Are We Diluting the Product?
From a fan’s perspective, it can feel like a grind. Let’s be real: a Tuesday game between two split squads filled with non-roster invitees doesn’t exactly scream “must-see TV.” But… it’s also where surprises happen. Remember when Ronald Acuña burst onto the scene in spring? Or when Spencer Strider showed flashes no one expected?

That said, shortening Spring Training might:

Keep fans more engaged

Raise the urgency of early games

Avoid overexposure before the real thing begins

Missed Opportunities?
You nailed it — Spring Training could be a sandbox for innovation. Why not test robo-umps, pitch clocks, or expanded challenges more aggressively during this time? If you’re going to experiment, do it when the stakes are low and data can still be collected.

Bold Prediction?
If MLB cut Spring Training by 10-14 days:

You’d see sloppier play the first two weeks of the regular season.

But by May? Pitching velocity would be up, fewer injuries, and better fan momentum from the jump.

The real test would be whether pitchers — especially starters — could ramp up properly with a shorter schedule. That’s where most coaches push back on shortening things.

Personal Experience?
Spring Training in Florida is vibes. Sunshine, proximity to the players, and those cozy little ballparks — it’s pure baseball joy. The crowds are lighter, players are relaxed, and every autograph-seeker feels like they have a shot. It’s not just about the games — it’s about access and connection.

So, let’s hear it:
Have you been to a Spring Training game? Any cool stories?

Who’s a player you first noticed in Spring that went on to become a favorite?

If you were commissioner, what would you change about Spring Training?